Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09870801"

See other formats


Exhibit 1 


1 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 


KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP . 
JOHN W. KEKER - #49092 
MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 
710 Sansome Street 
San Francisco, CA 94l 1 1-1 704 
Telephone: (415)391-5400 
Facsimile: "(415) 397-7188 - 

INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 

DOUGLAS K. DERWIN - #1 1 1407 

JEFFEJIY j. McDOW - #1 84727 

4800 Patrick Heniy Drive 

Santa Clara, CA 95054 

Telephone: (408)855-0100 

Facsimile: (408) 855-0144 

PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP 
MICHAEL J. LYONS - #202284 
300 Hillview A.venue 
Palo Alto, CA 94304 
Telephone: (650)493-4935 
Facsimile: (650) 493-5556 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant 
INTERTRUST TECP^OLOGIES CORPORATION 


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFOR>nA 


Case No. C 01-1640 SBA (MEJ) 

Consolidated with C 02-0647 SBA 

INTERTRUST'S DISCLOSURES OF 
ASSERTED CLAIMS AND 
PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT 
CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO 
PATENT LOCAL RULES 3-1 and 3-2 


(♦683, '193, '861, '721, '891, '900, '912, '019, 
'876, '181, and '402 Patents) 


INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 


MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a 
Washington corporation, 

Defendant. 


AND COUNTER ACTION. 


INITIAL DISCLOSURES. '683. * 193, :86U;721. '89U '900/912,^1 9^ '402 PATENTS 


1 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 


Pursuant to the Court's August 8, 2003 Order, PlaintifTlnterTrust Technologies 

Corporation ("InterTrust") hereby submits its Disclosures of Asserted Claims and Preliminary 

Infringement Contentions under Patent Local Rules 3-1 and 3-2 ("PLR 3-1 & 3-2 Disclosures") 

to Defendant Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft"). These PLR 3-1 & 3-2 Disclosures supercede 

all previous PLR 3^1 and PLR 3-2 disclosures servexi by InterTrust in this case. 

Patent Local Rule 3-1: Disclosure ofAsserted Claims and Preliminary 
Infringement Contentions 

(a) Asserted claims 

InterTrust currently contends that the Microsoft products identified herein infringe the 
claims of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,185,683 Bl ("the "683 patent"); 6,253,193 Bl ("the *193 patent"); 
5,920,861 ("the '861 patent"); 6,157,721 ('the '721 patent"); 5,982,891 ("the '891 patent"); 
5,892,900 ("the '900 patent"); 5,917,912 ("the '912 patent"); 5,915,019 ("the '019 patent"); 
5,949,876 ("the '876 patent"); 6; 112, 181 ("the '181 patent"); and 6,389,402 Bl ("the '402 
patent"), as identified in the attached claim charts. As discovery progresses, InterTrust may 
determine thai additional Microsoft products infringe the asserted patents and/or that Microsoft 
infiinges additional patent claims. InterTrust reserves the right to supplement and/or amend its 
disclosures and infiingement contentions. 

(b) Accused products 

InterTrust contends that various Microsoft products infringe the patent claims identified 
in the claim charts attached hereto. Accused products are listed in Exhibit A hereto. Accused 
jjroducts are listed in Exhibit A hereto, which is intended to encompass past, present, and fijture 
product versions that include the accused features and/or functionality. 

(c) Claim charts . 

InterTrust submits the attached claim charts based solely on information available to it to 
date. Discovery is ongoing, and additional information is likely to be produced during 

discover}/. hiterTrusl therefore reserves the riehi to supplement and/or amend its infringement 
assertions as discovery proceeds. 


317954.01 


1 i: 

I patent initial disclosures, *683, '193. "861. *721, '891, '900.. -912, '019, •87.6. '181. and •402 PATENTS 
CASE NO. C 01-1640 SBA (MEJ), CONSOLIDATED WITH C 02-0647 SBA 


1 

2, 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 


InterTrust contends that Microsoft infringes at least the claims of the '683, ' 1 93, '861 , 
'721, '891, '900, '912, '019, '876, '181, ancl '402 patents identified in the claim charts attached 

hereto as Exhibits B and C:' 

(d) Literal infringement and the doctrine of equivalents 

InterTrust contends that Microsoft infringes the claims of the '683, '193, '861, '721, 
'891, *900, '912, '019, '876, '181, and '402 patents as specified in Exhibits B and C both 
literally and under the doctrine of equivalents. 

(e) Priority from earlier applications 

InterTnist claims priority for the claims of the '891, '912. '683, '193, '019, '876, and 
402 patents-in-suit dating to application No. 08/388, 1 07, filed February 1 3, 1 995,. InterTnist 
:laims priority for the claims of the '900 patent-in-suit dating to application No. 08/695,927, 
lied August 12, 1996. InterTrust does not claim priority for the claims of the '721^ '861, and 
181 patents-in-suit dating to any earlier application. 

(0 Reliance on InterTrust's own products 

InterTrust does not currently intend to rely on the assertion that its own Commerce and 
lights System products practice at least some of the claimed inventions of the '683, '193, '861, 
721, '891, '900, '912, '019, '876, '181, and '402 patents-in-suit to support its infringement 
issertions against Microsoft. 

PATENT Local RULE 3-2: Document Productjon Accompanying Disclosure 
(a) Documents re disclosure and/or offer of sale 

hiterTmst is not currently aware of such documents other than the documents that have 
,reviously been produced. SeelT00017664-19168, 1.T00020866-21695, 1T00021700-23578, 


Exhibit B contains claim charts based upon publicly available or non-confidential source|. 
Exhibit C contains additional claim charts referencing material designated as "Attorneys Eyes 
Snly" by Microsoft, and is served under separate caption. No other information contained m 
hese disclosures is designated confidential by either parly, and InterTrust does not object to 
lissemination of this document, other than Exhibit C, to persons not permitted to view 
^nfidential information in this case. For ease of reference, the claim charts attached hereto 
nclude all claims previously disclosed by biterTrust, as well as new claims. 
^jumbering/letieringAjolding has been added to the texi of each claim for convenience only, and 
s not intended to alter, expand, or interpret the meaning of those claims. In mstances where 
nfiingement claims are illustrated by quotation or reference to Microsoft documents, those 


'ATENT initial DISCLOSURES. -683. • 193. -861. '721. -891. '900. 'g^Z.^OlP. '876 M81 arid '402 PATENTS 
CASE NO. C 01-1640 SBA (MEJ). CONSOUDATED WITH C 02-0647 SBA 


1 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 


IT00038608-43419. 

(b) Documents re conception, reduction to practice, and/or design/development 
InterTrust has produced nonprivileged documents concerning the conception, design, 

develoinnent, and reduction to practice of the inventions disclosed in the patfcnts-in-suit; See, 

IT00000005-17261, IT00036207-38606, IT0004 1497-549. In addition, InterTrust has 
produced voluminous archives of source code created in the course of its business, some of 
which may constitute additional evidence of the conception, design, development, and reduction 
to practice of its patented inventions. InterTrust is not currently aware of any other such 
nonprivileged documents in its possession or control other than said source code and the source 
code and documents that have beai produced. 

(c) Prosecution history of patentsHD-suit 

The prosecution histories of the patents-in-suit have previously been produced. See. 
IT00062350-67643, IT00070342-72434,FH00107455- 107731,FH0011^39-118857, 

FHl 18866-121322. = \ 

Dated: September ^.2003 KEKER & VAN NESt Ll> 



By: 

MIC*I^H.PA( 
Attorneys for Plaintifl/and Counter-Defendant 
INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 
CORPORATION 


references are intended to be exemplary only, and not limiting.